Section 1: The Problem — Whose Vision of Stablecoins Is This Really?
Rahab (Vo):
Here we go again. The U.S. Treasury and Fed are using the excuse of “regulation” as a means of control. The GSC (Genius Stablecoin Consortium)’s proposal might sound like it’s ensuring stability and trust in stablecoins, but let’s be real: they’re building an opaque wall for foreign issuers, while domestic companies get a greenhouse to grow in.
Moka (G/Vo):
That’s really scary… I used to think clear regulations were good for users and creators. But if those rules only serve major players, where does that leave indie artists like us? Wasn’t the point of DAO and Web3 about open, borderless access?
Rachel (Ba):
“The illusion that government interference guarantees market health has misled investors more than any other belief.” That quote from an old-school investment classic fits perfectly here. Regulation is necessary, but when it smothers innovation, it’s just Web2.5.
John (Dr):
The Web3 we believe in is supposed to allow equal participation from people all around the world. What this policy signals is, “We built the gate, but only our people may pass through it.” That divides the very community Web3 was meant to unify. We can’t let that happen.
Section 2: What Was Web3 Supposed to Be?
Rahab:
Web3 was a dream of borderless freedom. DAO-driven governance, community-first ecosystems. But now, America is redefining “trustworthy” as “domestic and permissioned.” What a joke.
Moka:
If this keeps up, creators like us will be pushed out. Even selling NFT event tickets or music might require going through a certified mega exchange. What happened to direct support from fans?
Rachel:
“True value often slips through the fingers of the majority.” That quote rings true. NFTs and tokens were alternative forms of self-expression. Now the U.S. wants to wrap everything in securities law and declare ownership. It’s a creative death sentence.
John:
That’s why we created PGirlsChain and our native PGirls Token. It’s an independent, decentralized network outside of national influence. Through this, we empower artists, fans, and communities to connect on their own terms.
Section 3: What Does This Mean from an Investment Perspective?
Rahab:
Regulating stablecoins for security? Sure. But when the rules carry political bias, it’s no longer about safety; it’s about power.
Moka:
As a creator, it’s terrifying to think that soon I might need government approval to tokenize my art or music. That’s not regulation—that’s censorship.
Rachel:
“Good investing means spotting value before anyone else.” But now, if you do that, you get labeled a risk. Is that what they call investor protection?
John:
That’s why PGirls developed a direct payment and royalty model via PGirls Token. This isn’t just about payments, it’s about value circulation without permission. The fan becomes a co-creator. That’s the essence of Web3.
Section 4: Conclusion — We Are the Guardians of Web3
John (Dr):
Yes, regulation is important. But when the rule-makers are just a handful of governments and corporate giants, we should be alarmed. The current stablecoin regulation push is not mere hygiene—it’s a power grab.
And the cost? Our creativity. Our community. Our future.
That’s why PGirls exists: to preserve and expand what Web3 promised. Through PGirlsChain, we build a borderless network where every artist, fan, and investor can act freely.
Together, we’re not just participants. We’re architects of a better web.
コメント