Section 1: The Irony of U.S. Government “Data Decentralization”
Rahab
“According to Cointelegraph, the U.S. government plans to distribute economic data on-chain through Chainlink and Pyth. On the surface, it claims transparency and democratized access, but do you really believe that? Isn’t it rather a contradiction—‘decentralization controlled by the government’?”
Moka
“At first glance, it seems convenient for citizens. But the essence is different. Government-chosen nodes, government-chosen oracles… If the very gateways to information we access are managed, isn’t that just centralization again?”
Rachel
“It reminds me of the irony that ‘the more people believe in a free market, the more likely they fall into unfreedom.’ History shows that whenever governments or big capital shouted ‘transparency,’ monopolization of information advanced behind the scenes.”
John
“That’s precisely why we run our independent PGirlsChain. Instead of ‘transparency’ held in the hands of the U.S., we provide DAO-like transparency where anyone can participate. That’s the true ideal of Web3.”
Agency
Chooses datasets & disclosure policy
Selected Oracles
Distribution to specific partners → centralization risk
On-Chain Data
“Transparent,” but source under control; gov-centered governance
DAO (Community)
Policy via proposals & voting; PGirls for governance
Permissionless Nodes
Open participation & verification; censorship resistance
On-Chain Data
Multi-source, community-verified; DAO/PGirls governance
Section 2: Big Capital Destroying the Ideals of Web3
Rahab
“Web3 was originally meant to build cross-border communities through DAOs, wasn’t it? But now it’s different. U.S. capital inflates speculation and has turned Web3 into a ‘financial casino.’”
Moka
“For the average user, the only topic is whether crypto will make money. That itself is proof that both information and value are dominated by investors’ perspectives.”
Rachel
“As one book notes: ‘When people confuse investing with speculation, the greatest danger arises.’ The current crypto market is exactly in that condition.”
John
“PGirlsChain and PGirls are designed not to depend on that structure. The token’s essence is not speculation but the blood that connects the community. We need to restore that value.”
Section 3: DAO and the Freedom of Information
Rahab
“The U.S. government’s move basically means it decides ‘which data gets distributed.’ That’s the opposite of DAO decision-making. The power to control information grows stronger.”
Moka
“In that case, we end up seeing only an ‘edited reality’ without realizing it… Ordinary people lose the chance to think for themselves.”
Rachel
“It’s said that ‘when market information is manipulated, rational judgment becomes nothing but illusion.’ That’s why the freedom of information is fundamental in investment and economics.”
John
“PGirlsChain has a system where anyone can verify data. Transparency should not be entrusted to state power but secured by the community. That stance is the soul of Web3.”
State-Edited Pipeline
DAO-Style Distributed Verification
Each lane stacks vertically and scales to fit the content area—no horizontal overflow.
Section 4: Conclusion — The Significance of PGirlsChain
Rahab
“In short, the U.S. government’s move to put data on-chain is nothing but ‘management disguised as freedom.’”
Moka
“If it spreads, ordinary people will increasingly ‘depend comfortably.’ But behind that comfort, control grows stronger.”
Rachel
“Let’s not forget the lesson: ‘The efficient market is an illusion, and when there are too many foolish participants, inefficiency is inevitable.’ Today’s crypto market proves this.”
John
“That’s why PGirlsChain exists. Through the PGirls token, we restore value not to speculation but to community building. To reclaim the original Web3 envisioned by DAOs, not the distorted version twisted by big capital.”
コメント