Shaken Trust Signaled by the Ethereum Foundation’s Support Freeze: How PGirls’ Independent Network Pioneers ‘Redefined Decentralization’

Section 1: The Foundation’s Sudden Decision

Rahab
“According to Crypto.news, the Ethereum Foundation has ‘indefinitely’ paused its ecosystem support program. At first glance it looks like a ‘review of funding allocation,’ but I see it differently. Isn’t this rather proof that a network that was supposed to champion decentralization is, behind the scenes, yielding to pressure from capital and centralization?”

Moka
“Yeah, for everyday users like us, ‘to increase transparency’ sounds convincing. But flip it over and it means a handful of organizations can control the flow of funds. The ‘open network anyone can join’ we believed in might be drifting toward illusion, right?”

Rachel
“There’s an old saying: ‘The greatest danger in investing isn’t the market itself, but the intentions of those who control it.’ Once funding stops, even the best projects freeze. That’s the ‘cold cruelty’ of markets.”

John
“True—this decision could be fatal for some projects. Which is exactly why we need a ‘path without dependency.’ PGirlsChain and the PGirls token present a model where funds circulate through DAO-style decision-making, independent of outside capital pressure. That’s not just idealism—it’s already working in practice.”

Section 1: Decision & Impact (Funding Shock)

Section 2: The Market and the Trap of Speculation

Rahab
“The problem runs deeper. When ecosystem support stops, the remaining projects are forced to rely on speculative money to survive. The whole Web3 market risks devolving into a ‘nest of speculation.’”

Moka
“If that happens, genuinely needed use cases get buried, and only short-term moneymakers get the spotlight… Projects end up designed for investors, not for users.”

Rachel
“It reminds me of the line, ‘Don’t go along with the market’s folly; but those who can harness it survive.’ In the end, healthy decentralization exists only beyond the market’s noise.”

John
“That’s precisely why PGirlsChain is designed to avoid dependency on speculative capital. Participants co-create value, and rewards circulate autonomously through the PGirls token. It’s a design that goes beyond the capitalist ‘top-down hierarchy.’”

Section 2: Market & the Speculation Trap

Section 3: DAO Principles and U.S. Capital

Rahab
“Behind the Foundation’s move I see the shadow of U.S. mega-capital. The DAO ideal—‘communities beyond borders’—is inconvenient for them. So under the banner of ‘support,’ they try to control the network.”

Moka
“Plenty of people think DAOs are just a ‘pipe dream.’ But the moment we give up, the rule of centralization and speculation becomes complete.”

Rachel
“There’s a saying: ‘Freedom isn’t granted; it’s taken.’ Same with DAOs. If we wait passively, true decentralization will never happen.”

John
“That’s why we operate PGirlsChain on DAO principles—anchored in transparency and consensus, letting anyone participate in decisions. That structure is the force that shapes a Web3 not dependent on U.S. capital.”

Section 3: DAO Principles vs. Capital

Section 4: PGirlsChain Points to a New Path

Rahab
“This decision by the Ethereum Foundation is a trial for Web3 as a whole. But at the same time, it exposes the danger of dependency.”

Moka
“Right. I actually think this event is a chance for us to look for a ‘different path.’”

Rachel
“I’m reminded of the line, ‘Those who protect their margin of safety win over the long term.’ A network we support ourselves—without relying on outside capital—is that very ‘margin of safety.’”

John
“My conclusion is this: the support freeze signals the ‘risk of dependency’ in Web3. PGirlsChain and the PGirls token are an experiment—and a practical answer—to transcend that risk. We will build a DAO-driven network with our own hands, beyond capital’s control. That is the future of next-generation Web3.”

Section 4: PGirlsChain Design (Self-Sustaining Ecosystem)