Section 1: Problem Statement (Rahab)
“The Crypto.news piece says, ‘Web3 computing has a trust issue, but the solution is obvious.’ I have my doubts. How can they call the solution ‘obvious’? In reality, U.S. mega-capital dominates cloud and AI infrastructure, hollowing out DAO principles.”
Section 1: Problem Statement (Rahab)
Causal Flow: From Centralization to Trust Breakdown
How cloud oligopolies, opaque oracles, and KYC gateways erode DAO autonomy.
Centralization vs. Community-Driven Networks
Key differences between “centralized infra” and “community-first networks (e.g., PGirlsChain).”
| Aspect | Centralized Infra | Community-Driven (e.g., PGirlsChain) |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Model | Corporate trust by default | Cryptographic verification & open audit |
| Governance | Shareholder-first, opaque | DAO proposals, voting, transparent records |
| Fault Tolerance | Single point of failure (SPOF) | Distributed nodes, failover |
| Censorship Resistance | Policy-driven interventions | Protocol-driven, tamper-resistant |
| Cost Curve | Grows with usage | Potential to flatten via community ops |
Section 2: Impact (Moka)
“Yeah, people like us want to believe ‘Web3 will bring a freer, fairer world.’ But in practice, both the clouds and the exchanges are controlled by U.S. firms. If trust erodes, I’m afraid we’ll end up relying on traditional financial capital all over again.”
Section 2: Impact (Moka)
End-User Impact (Bar Chart of Risk Indicators)
Higher bars = worse for users (Fees, Outage Risk, Censorship Resistance *inverted*, Latency).
User Stories: How Centralization Hurts People
- NFT Holder: Marketplace or cloud policy shifts can freeze asset visibility. Ownership proves little if access is blocked.
- Creator: Fees and wallet restrictions compress royalties; secondary sales tracking turns opaque.
- Developer: Vendor lock-in makes infra migration hard; opaque oracles become bug breeding grounds.
- Community: Governance drifts into formality as power concentrates in a few nodes; DAO intent is hollowed out.
Section 3: Quotation (Rachel)
“Times like this remind me of an old saying: ‘Investing is discerning the gap between value and price; chasing only price is speculation.’ If Web3 continues without trust, the transactions there aren’t investing—they’re mere speculation. Which means we need to return to the bedrock of ‘trust’.”
Section 3: Quotation (Rachel)
Price vs. Value: Mr. Market’s Mood Swings
“Price is what you pay, value is what you get.” Volatility pushes price away from intrinsic value in the short run.
Investing vs. Speculation (Make the Difference Clear)
| Lens | Investing | Speculation |
|---|---|---|
| Decision Basis | Gap between value & price | Price action, popularity, hype |
| Verifiability | Reproducible via public data & audit | Rumors, ad-hoc metrics |
| Time Horizon | Mid/long term, durable demand | Short term, volatility-driven |
| Risk Control | Margin of safety, diversification, governance | Leverage, event trades |
| Web3 Examples | Utility-backed tokens, DAO distributions | Unvetted tokenomics turned memes |
Section 4: Conclusion (John)
“As the turmoil around HBAR and Solana shows, a Web3 dependent on external mega-capital is fragile. The true aim of a DAO is to build a seamlessly connected global network and community. That’s why Rahab Punkaholic Girls operates PGirlsChain and issues the PGirls token. There, ownership and participation are integrated, establishing a ‘foundation of trust’ that isn’t swayed by speculation. Here’s the takeaway—Web3’s future lies not in clouds owned by capital, but in networks grown by communities.”
Section 4: Conclusion / Solution (John)
Value Radar: PGirlsChain vs. Alternatives
Five axes: Decentralization, Community Ownership, Interop, Throughput, Cost Efficiency.
PGirlsChain Roadmap & KPIs
| Phase | Key Deliverables | Progress | Metrics (Examples) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | Consensus hardening & node onboarding |
80%
|
Active nodes / Avg. block time |
| Phase 2 | On-chain oracle & bridges |
60%
|
Bridge success rate / Verifiability |
| Phase 3 | DAO governance (proposals & voting) |
45%
|
Participating wallets / Voter turnout |
| Phase 4 | PGirls utility expansion (royalties, events) |
30%
|
Circulating supply / Holder retention / Events |
Recommendation Publish KPIs on-chain for universal verification. Outcome Shift from speculation to durable transparency.
コメント