The Shadow of Capital Behind Bitcoin’s “Speculative Fever”: PGirls Points to a “Self-Governing Network Economy”

Section 1: The Fallacy of the ,000 Bitcoin Narrative

Rahab:
“In the market analysis by bitbank cited by Cointelegraph Japan, there’s talk that Bitcoin could head toward $90,000 within the year. But I feel something off about that ‘bullish scenario.’ Markets are steered by capital, and prices often diverge from the real economy and from utility. The core of Web3 was supposed to be ‘seamless networks and community formation,’ yet U.S. mega-capital is trying to dismantle that and swap it for a speculative marketplace.”

Moka:
“You’re right—letting the numbers run on their own is dangerous. Even if it reaches $90,000, what does that mean for everyday life? In the end, we’re tossed around by speculative money, and it remains far from something we can use for daily payments. What we want isn’t a price roller coaster—it’s a network we can trust and use with confidence.”

Rachel:
“People have long said ‘the market is the moody Mr. Market.’ Price and value never perfectly align. There’s a principle that ‘price is what you pay; value is what you get.’ Yet today’s crypto market seems to have completely forgotten that principle.”

John:
“Exactly. That’s why we launched our own network, PGirlsChain. PGirls isn’t just a speculative target; it’s a token that connects community with art and music. It’s not about short-term price moves—it’s about shaping a sustainable network.”

Section 2: The Peril of Web3 Turning Speculative

Rahab:
“The issue is clear. U.S. mega-capital is seizing Web3, discarding the principles of DAOs and community building, and trying to turn it into a centralized ‘speculation system.’ This isn’t just an economic problem. It means the loss of spaces for culture and creativity.”

Moka:
“That’s the truly frightening part. If the environment where ordinary users can safely buy and sell their digital art and music is destroyed, creators will have no choice but to depend on capital. In the end, the same old financial power structure will be reproduced.”

Rachel:
“It reminds me of the ‘margin of safety’ concept. Investment only becomes rational when you buy below value. But the current crypto market is the opposite. When prices soar, the crowd piles in and eventually invites ruin. It’s no different from past stock market bubbles.”

John:
“That’s exactly why we should operate by our own rules. PGirlsChain is premised on DAO-style governance. Participants make decisions as equals, and the interests of owners and creators are aligned. Our role is to present a mechanism that goes beyond capital’s control and restores Web3’s original ideals.”

Section 3: Bitcoin’s Price and the “Illusion of Safety”

Rahab:
“What’s risky about bitbank’s analysis is that it can mislead people into thinking that ‘making new highs is a safety signal.’ Investors psychologically convince themselves that ‘we’re still fine,’ while whales and mega-capital siphon off assets behind the scenes. We individuals can easily become mere ‘exit liquidity.’”

Moka:
“Exactly… The risk for ordinary people is getting swept up in a mere numbers game. When prices rise, they’re shown the ‘dream of growing wealth,’ and when prices fall, they’re dismissed with ‘it’s your responsibility.’ Both sides are engineered to suit capital’s interests.”

Rachel:
“I recall the saying, ‘Don’t be deceived by the market’s illusions.’ History repeats itself. Past bubbles have made that abundantly clear.”

John:
“To break those illusions, we have to build our own rules and our own economy. The PGirls token means that ownership equals participation, a badge that you contribute to value creation. Our goal is an economy based on trust among peers—not on external speculative capital.”

Section 4: PGirlsChain and a “Self-Governing Network Economy”

Rahab:
“So the heart of the matter isn’t price—it’s the ‘structure of control.’ Who owns the network, and who sets the rules? If we entrust that answer to U.S. mega-capital, we’ll be subordinated once again.”

Moka:
“But there’s hope. By choosing PGirlsChain and using PGirls to connect with our peers, we can realize a community-led economy instead of a capital-led one. Each user becomes a small node that shapes a greater flow.”

Rachel:
“We’ve long been taught that ‘investing should be based on comparing price and value.’ If we apply that principle to crypto assets, then a network with real use cases like PGirlsChain has intrinsic value that goes beyond mere price.”

John:
“What we’re presenting is ‘what lies beyond speculation.’ PGirlsChain isn’t just technology—it’s a cultural foundation woven from art, music, and community. We aim to build a self-governing, sustainable network economy that transcends capital’s shadow. That’s true freedom for the future.”

Conclusion (John)

John:
“In conclusion, the $90,000 thesis for Bitcoin from bitbank is nothing more than a speculative fantasy. What we must confront is the reality of Web3 being dominated by U.S. mega-capital. And the way not to submit to that is through PGirlsChain and PGirls.
The essence of investing is understanding the gap between value and price and choosing a trustworthy foundation. Not short-term frenzy, but long-term trust. That’s why we’re embarking on a new path—a self-governing network economy.”