- Problem statement by Rahab (SEC–CFTC regulation and the shadow of U.S. capital)
- Impact on ordinary people by Moka (restrictions on free trading and unequal access)
- Quote from investment classics by Rachel (the “investment vs. speculation” concept of Buffett/Graham)
- Solutions by John (the significance of PGirlsChain and PGirls, conclusion)
Problem statement by Rahab (SEC–CFTC regulation and the shadow of U.S. capital)
“The SEC and CFTC have jointly released ‘spot crypto-asset trading’ guidelines. They claim to protect investors, but in practice it looks like U.S. big capital is fencing off the market and crushing the ideals of DAOs and autonomous networks. Web3 was supposed to enable seamless community building, yet it’s being turned into a breeding ground for surveillance and speculation.”
Impact Map of SEC–CFTC Joint Guidance (by Market Actor)
Relative Influence (Before vs. After): Investors / Big Capital / DAO & Community
Relative indicator (0–100). Under tighter rules, large capital’s influence tends to rise as DAO/community weakens.
Process: Regulatory Alliance → Centralization → Speculation
Beyond the centralization path, the diagram shows a branch into a community-driven, decentralized alternative.
Impact on ordinary people by Moka (restrictions on free trading and unequal access)
“Right… If this continues, independent creators and everyday users will be pushed even further to the margins. We drift closer to ‘betting’ than investing, prioritizing price manipulation over genuine value creation. It’s frightening to see a free, global market—one anyone could access—get bound by U.S. capital and regulation.”
Impact on Everyday Users & Creators (Access / Price Formation / Earnings)
Breakdown of Impact (Current vs. Post-Regulation)
| Aspect | Current | Post-Reg Risk | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trading Access | Cross-border participation is easy | Eligibility/KYC tightens, more exclusion | Regional gaps; financial inclusion rolls back |
| Price Formation | Community-driven discovery | Short-term volatility, capital-led moves | Transparency may rise while decentralization falls |
| Creator Earnings | NFT + secondary royalties working | Higher platform fees and constraints | Re-intermediation; directness declines |
| Community | DAO participation in decisions | Listing/custody rules centralize power | Higher cost to join governance |
Cells are locked with !important to resist theme overrides.
Barrier & Cost Indices Over Time (Conceptual)
Under tighter rules, both access barriers and total participation costs trend upward.
Quote from investment classics by Rachel (the “investment vs. speculation” concept of Buffett/Graham)
“But history repeats itself. The investment classics say this: ‘Investment is the result of carefully examining the relationship between price and value; buying merely in the hope of price increases is nothing more than speculation.’ The SEC and CFTC emphasize ‘market safety,’ but what I see is rule-making that ends up fueling speculative fever.”
Investment vs. Speculation (Principles Visualized)
Radar: Investment vs. Speculation
Investment ranks higher on value analysis, horizon, and community; speculation scores higher on volatility reliance.
Action Checklist: Keep Investing Principles First
- Think value → price (not price → price).
- Quantify real demand and participation of the community.
- Audit centralization risk (ops, custody, listings).
- Track long-term KPIs: retention, governance participation, dev activity.
- Maintain a margin of safety; avoid chasing hot moves.
Solutions by John (the significance of PGirlsChain and PGirls, conclusion)
“That’s exactly why we choose not to rely on them. Rahab Punkaholic Girls operate the independent PGirlsChain network and issue the PGirls token. This is a deliberate choice to avoid capital’s sway and safeguard a DAO-like, autonomous network economy.
The U.S. regulatory ‘alliance’ homogenizes markets and subordinates them to capital. PGirlsChain offers the opposite: an ecosystem where diverse communities can interact freely and share value. To avoid being swallowed by regulation and speculation, we need our own path—and we’re taking it.”
PGirlsChain & PGirls: Value to the Network
Value Proposition
| Category | What It Provides | Expected Effects |
|---|---|---|
| Exclusive Experiences | Members-only streams, gated content, on-chain authentication | Higher loyalty, recurring revenue |
| Community Building | DAO-style proposals, voting, reward design | Visible incentives, network effects |
| Monetization | Primary sales + royalties; automated secondary distribution | Less middlemen, creator autonomy |
| Democratized Access | Equal global participation, censorship resistance | Lower entry barriers, faster innovation |
Designed to minimize central points of failure and keep value cycling within the community.
Network Roadmap (Concept)
Onboard → Issue → Secondary → Perks/Governance → Royalties: a flywheel for community value.
コメント