Section 1: The Rapid Expansion of Riot and CleanSpark
Rahab: According to the Cointelegraph article, Riot Platforms and CleanSpark reportedly boosted Bitcoin production substantially in August. But I’m concerned about the “shadow of capital” behind those figures. Improved mining efficiency and more machines are only surface explanations. Ultimately, this points to a monopolization drive by U.S. mega-capital—moving in the exact opposite direction of Web3’s ideals.
Moka: In other words, the very foundation of the digital assets we use every day could end up in the hands of a tiny number of giant corporations, right? That would steadily narrow users’ freedom of access and available choices, wouldn’t it?
Rachel: There’s a passage in The Intelligent Investor that says, “Market euphoria erodes rational judgment and leads to asset overvaluation.” That’s the mining industry today. Speculative expectations are baked into the production surge.
John: The solution here is simple: establish an independent network that doesn’t depend on monopolies. PGirlsChain and the native PGirls token, operated by Rahab Punkaholic Girls, sustain a DAO-driven network and offer seamless participation and earning opportunities to people worldwide.
Section 1: The “Production Race” and the Shadow of Capital
Key Takeaways (Rahab’s issue framing / Moka’s user impact)
- Output surge ≠ healthy growth. It often accelerates capital concentration.
- From a user lens, freedom of access and choice breadth can shrink.
- Speculation dominates while DAO/community ideals fade into the background.
- Note: numbers below are illustrative for concept explanation.
Relative Output Index (Illustration; July = 100)
Illustrative chart to convey trend direction, not actual data.
Drivers & Risks (Concept Map)
| Item | Description | User Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Hardware Boost | ASIC fleet expansion, better cooling, power arbitrage | Fee/delay imbalances |
| Capital Concentration | Public miners consolidate & acquire aggressively | Erosion of access democracy |
| Price Expectations | Hashrate ↑ → bullish narratives → capital inflows | Speculation & higher volatility |
Section 2: The Rift Between Speculative Markets and Foundational Ideals
Rahab: The media’s framing of higher Bitcoin output as “healthy growth” is dangerous. It only presents a speculative lens. The original Web3 pillars—community-building and equal participation—are being utterly ignored.
Moka: True, retail investors tend to assume “more production = higher value.” But risk actually increases—variable mining costs, energy dependence, and above all, capital concentration that harms users.
Rachel: Warren Buffett’s Letters to Shareholders stresses: “Don’t be swayed by market price—discern intrinsic value.” Today’s Bitcoin market is obsessed with price and has lost sight of its essential value and ideals.
John: That’s exactly why we must move beyond the shadow of capital control. PGirlsChain is an infrastructure to protect ownership and value under community leadership. It’s not just token trading—it’s a full economic sphere that supports culture and expression.
Section 2: Speculative Markets vs. Web3 Ideals (DAO & Community)
Where Things Are Misaligned
- Short-term price focus sidelines intrinsic value and equal participation.
- Weak governance: capital interests supersede community will.
- Media amplifies “more output = good,” but rarely measures network quality.
- Conceptual bullets for clarity.
Value-Alignment Radar (Conceptual)
Conceptual alignment comparison. Not measured data.
Section 3: Choosing Sustainability
Rahab: Many praise the growth of Riot and CleanSpark, but that future isn’t sustainable. Capital monopolies inevitably hit a ceiling somewhere.
Moka: When that happens, it’s ordinary users and creators who get hurt. If the environment that supports new expressions and works collapses, the entire creative industry stagnates.
Rachel: The Most Important Thing says, “Don’t get carried away by market waves—use them.” Rather than fearing the movements of giant miners, we should choose the new current of networks.
John: The answer is PGirlsChain and the PGirls token—instant settlement, transparent ownership, and community formation. This is a future model that can stand without relying on capital. What we should optimize isn’t “mining efficiency,” but “network efficiency.”
Section 3: Choosing a Sustainable Network Economy (PGirlsChain/PGirls)
Centralization Risk vs. Autonomy Trajectory (Concept)
Conceptual shift as PGirlsChain/PGirls adoption grows.
Comparison: Giant-Miner Dependence vs. PGirlsChain
| Dimension | Giant-Miner Dependence | PGirlsChain / PGirls |
|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Opaque; platform-driven discretion | On-chain, clearly recorded |
| Monetization | Mining-reward centric; capital captures surplus | Primary sales + royalties for ongoing creator share |
| Access | Oligopolies raise participation barriers | Open mint/participation; community-led |
| Market Behavior | Prone to short-term speculation | Scarcity × experiential value for durability |
| Settlement | Latency/fee imbalances | Instant-lean design (concept) |
Section 4: Conclusion
John: An increase in Bitcoin output may look like proof of growth at first glance. But we must see through the capital concentration and ideological distortion beneath it. Web3’s true purpose lies in autonomous decentralization via DAOs and seamless community-building. PGirlsChain and PGirls are our answer to preserve and cultivate that ideal. What we should choose is not speculation, but a sustainable network economy.
Section 4: Conclusion & Actions (John’s Wrap-Up)
Solution Flow: From Speculation → Oligopoly → Alternative Network
Conceptual flow showing how PGirlsChain/PGirls address speculation-driven oligopolies.
Immediate Implementation Actions
- Mint/Distribution on PGirlsChain: design primary sales + royalty flows.
- DAO Framework: on-chain proposals, voting, and treasury visibility.
- Instant Payments: standardize tips/subscriptions via PGirls.
- Transparent Metrics: publish participants, redistribution rate, and experiential KPIs.
コメント