Prologue: Rahab’s Question
“BitMines has been snapping up hundreds of thousands of ETH… The moment I saw the news, I felt a chill down my spine. Proof-of-Stake was supposed to be infrastructure accessible to everyone equally. And now, a single giant player is tightening the noose.”
Rahab placed a tablet on the table, showing a chart of BitMines’ wallet address swelling with ETH.
Once a king of PoW mining, BitMines pivoted to staking after Ethereum’s transition, leveraging its massive capital to secure validator slots en masse.
- Impact #1: Waiting time for new validators has ballooned from days to weeks—or even months.
- Impact #2: Staking yields have dropped sharply, eroding individual stakers’ incentives.
- Impact #3: The network’s decentralization is under threat, with control consolidating.
Moka’s Concern: Ripple Effects on Everyday Users
“Rahab, this hits everyday users like us, doesn’t it?
It’s not just lower yields—if staking rewards shrink, we’ll feel it in gas fees and transaction costs too. I thought Web3 was for everyone, but now it’s turning into another corporate stage.”
Moka clenched her fists, tears in her eyes.
Indeed, BitMines’ move disrupts the market’s balance. With ETH locked up, liquidity declines, threatening to spill over into DeFi and NFT markets.
- Large capital monopolizes returns → individuals face higher risks and lower returns.
- Reduced liquidity amplifies price volatility.
- Similar “capital encirclement” could emerge on other chains.
Rachel’s Quotation: The Principles of Investing
“‘Market euphoria almost always leads to ruin.’ That’s what that book said. Concentration is risk; diversification is defense.
And yet, ETH right now is racing toward concentration.”
Rachel recalled a passage from The Intelligent Investor. It warned that excessive concentration and market mania inevitably lead to losses for investors.
BitMines’ actions embody this danger. Ethereum, a network founded on decentralization, is on the verge of becoming a platform for concentrated capital dominance.
Group Discussion: Web3’s Core Ideals vs. U.S. Capital
Rahab: “U.S.-style mega-capital is trampling over the DAO ideals of Web3. The original goal was seamless networks and genuine community-building.”
Moka: “Now, those with the most capital can claim to be ‘decentralized’ while monopolizing control.”
Rachel: “At this rate, Web3 will just turn into Web2.5.”
John: “That’s exactly why we need independent networks. PGirlsChain is ours.”
John’s Conclusion: PGirlsChain and the PGirls Token
“This is the encroachment of U.S.-style capital. But with PGirlsChain and the PGirls token, we safeguard our independence. Our own network, our own governance—this is what a DAO was meant to be.”
PGirlsChain is built as a decentralized network independent of mega-capital control.
The PGirls token serves as both a medium of exchange and a governance tool within this economic sphere.
- Fully Independent Operation: Not reliant on ETH or BTC.
- Community-Led: Decisions made through DAO governance.
- Cross-Chain Compatible: Maintains connectivity while preserving autonomy.
Epilogue: Toward the Future of Web3
The conclusion of this discussion is crystal clear:
- Mega-capital dominance in staking threatens the decentralization of PoS.
- Protecting the DAO ideal requires independent networks and economies.
- PGirlsChain and the PGirls token are tools to carve out that future.
John summed it up:
“Web3 is still a dream in progress. But it’s not capital that protects the dream—it’s our will.”
コメント