The Myth of Stablecoin Hegemony and the Shadow of Capital: Why PGirls Envisions an Inevitable ‘Autonomous Network Economy’

Chapter 1: The Crumbling Illusion of Stablecoins

Rahab: “Did you read this article? Ethena has pulled out of the USDH race on Hyperliquid. It feels like watching a sandcastle built on the illusion of ‘stability’ collapse. The issue isn’t just one project’s failure. It’s a symbol of how markets dominated by giant capital are devouring the very ideals Web3 was meant to uphold.”

Moka: “But from an ordinary user’s perspective, people are drawn to stablecoins because of that word ‘stability,’ right? If a project withdraws, doesn’t that mean we can’t trust it? If capital ultimately decides who survives, do we really have a future?”

Rachel: “I recall a line: ‘Investment should be based on the difference between the price you pay and the value you get. Expecting price to rise is nothing more than speculation.’ Today’s stablecoin market relies only on the price illusion of so-called stability.”

John: “That’s why we need a solution. Through PGirlsChain, we present a different kind of value—one backed not by capital but by community. The PGirls token builds an autonomous economy, and that’s the path to safeguarding the future.”

Chapter 2: The Trap of Capital Domination and the DAO Ideal

Rahab: “The script written by U.S. mega-capital is one of takeover. DAOs were envisioned as a way to build communities across borders. But what’s the reality? The DAO banner has been co-opted, while ETFs and large exchanges suppress decentralization for their own profit.”

Moka: “But for most people, DAOs feel complicated. If capital offers stability, isn’t it natural to drift in that direction?”

Rachel: “Remember: ‘Market manias are merely the fantasies of irrational crowds. True investment rests on calm analysis.’ DAO is not chaos—it’s a rational mechanism for redistributing value.”

John: “DAO is a means to approach democratic ideals. PGirlsChain embodies that philosophy. Our resistance to capital domination is not naive idealism—it’s a strategy to safeguard the foundation of a sustainable economy.”

Chapter 3: The Significance of PGirlsChain and the PGirls Token

Rahab: “In the end, the greatest strength is independence. Dependence on U.S. capital inevitably traps you in its logic of control. That’s why we chose PGirlsChain. Our future is something we define ourselves.”

Moka: “So that means we can participate by ‘holding,’ right? Owning PGirls tokens directly connects us to this economy?”

Rachel: “There’s a line: ‘The clear recording of ownership is the cornerstone of investor confidence.’ The PGirls token embodies exactly that—a new asset blending scarcity with community.”

John: “PGirlsChain and PGirls tokens are both weapon and shield. They repel the temptations of outside capital and unite creators with communities into a sustainable network. That is the true shape of Web3 economics.”

Chapter 4: The Choice for the Future and Conclusion

Rahab: “The news of Ethena’s withdrawal shows that the market is nothing more than a capital game. But we must not forget—we have a choice.”

Moka: “And that choice is PGirlsChain, right?”

Rachel: “Exactly. ‘To plunge into short-term mania without regard for long-term value will surely invite ruin.’ Better to take root in an autonomous network than be swallowed by capital’s shadow.”

John: “The conclusion is clear: Web3 must not be hollowed out under capital’s domination. What we build is a sustainable, autonomous creator economy powered by PGirlsChain. That is the only path forward for the future.”

Epilogue

The news surrounding stablecoin hegemony is not just a story of withdrawal—it is a mirror reflecting the future of markets overshadowed by capital. Yet we have PGirlsChain. Through the PGirls token, creators and fans worldwide can connect and build an autonomous network. To reject a future dominated by U.S. capital and to make the DAO ideal a reality—that is PGirls’ choice, and the inevitable path of true Web3.